{"id":52440,"date":"2025-11-13T13:39:43","date_gmt":"2025-11-13T13:39:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/test.excelmedias.com\/Security\/2025\/11\/13\/city-hall-security-guard-settles-sexual-harassment-suit\/"},"modified":"2025-11-13T13:39:43","modified_gmt":"2025-11-13T13:39:43","slug":"city-hall-security-guard-settles-sexual-harassment-suit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/test.excelmedias.com\/Security\/2025\/11\/13\/city-hall-security-guard-settles-sexual-harassment-suit\/","title":{"rendered":"City Hall Security Guard Settles Sexual Harassment Suit"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/mynewsla.com\/crime\/2025\/09\/30\/guard-who-alleged-boss-asked-if-she-was-having-her-period-settles-suit\/#google_vignette\"><strong>Article Originally Published Here<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p>A security guard who worked the graveyard shift at Los Angeles City Hall has settled her sexual harassment lawsuit against the company that employed her, in which she alleged that one supervisor asked her if she was on her monthly menstrual cycle.<\/p>\n<p>Chandi Davis\u2019 Los Angeles Superior Court lawsuit, filed against Platinum Security Inc., contended that her work environment forced her to resign in 2023. Her suit alleged sexual harassment, gender discrimination, retaliation, failure to prevent harassment, discrimination and retaliation, constructive discharge, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.<\/p>\n<p>Her attorney, a member of the law firm of Lisa Bloom, filed court papers with Judge Peter Hernandez notifying him that the case was resolved. No terms were revealed.<\/p>\n<p>In their court papers, Platinum Security attorneys denied Davis\u2019 allegations and said that the company\u2019s actions concerning Davis were permissible due to an \u201coverriding legitimate business purpose\u201d necessary to Platinum\u2019s \u201csafe and efficient operation.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>According to Davis\u2019 suit, she was hired in April 2022 and patrolled the City Hall parking structures by car from midnight to 6 a.m. She was the sole provider for four young children, was the only female at her work site and she was happy to have a stable and secure income source, the suit stated.<\/p>\n<p>Davis initially paid little attention to the gender disparity, but biases \u201cbrimmed underneath the surface\u201d and one of her supervisors began to question her job capabilities, saying she was \u201ctoo emotional,\u201d the suit filed in May 2024 stated.<\/p>\n<p>The same boss later questioned another guard, who was married, as to whether he and Davis were intimate while on duty, according to the suit, which further stated the supervisor shrugged off the plaintiff\u2019s concerns when she complained.<\/p>\n<p>The alleged harassment continued when a female guard from another firm told Davis that she had also heard that a Platinum woman guard with the same nickname as the plaintiff was sexually promiscuous, the suit stated.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cPlaintiff was shocked and embarrassed to find out that sexually inappropriate, humiliating and false rumors had been spread about plaintiff within and also outside of Platinum,\u201d the suit further contends.<\/p>\n<p>Another supervisor who overheard Davis once again protesting to the first boss about the alleged promiscuity rumors asked Davis, \u201cWhat, are you on your period? You\u2019re so emotional, calm down, it\u2019s not that serious,\u201d the suit alleged.<\/p>\n<p>Exacerbated by the thought of having to see and continue working with the alleged harassing supervisor, she reached out to the human resources department directly, but the unsympathetic response left her even more distraught and concerned, the suit alleged.<\/p>\n<p>In retaliation, the supervisor began giving her duties that required her to get out of her company car to perform without anyone to back her up for her safety, duties that were not asked of her previously, the suit stated.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt became clear that (the supervisor) purposefully placed plaintiff in a position where she had inadequate protection and refused to provide an adequate amount of security to protect her in the dangerous job she performed,\u201d the suit alleged.<\/p>\n<p>Platinum cut Davis\u2019 weekly hours from 42 to 30 and the boss \u201ccontinued to poison her male colleagues against her for reporting his sexual harassment,\u201d the suit stated.<\/p>\n<p>The allegedly hostile work environment was so unbearable that Davis was forced to quit in January 2023, according the suit, which further stated that Davis is experiencing anxiety, stress, decreased quality and quantity of sleep and headaches and worries that it will be difficult to get a security guard job with another company.<\/p>\n\n<p>The post <a href=\"https:\/\/securityguardservices.com\/city-hall-security-guard-settles-sexual-harassment-suit\/\">City Hall Security Guard Settles Sexual Harassment Suit<\/a> appeared first on <a href=\"https:\/\/securityguardservices.com\/\">Security Guard Services Magazine<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/securityguardservices.com\/city-hall-security-guard-settles-sexual-harassment-suit\/\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"feedzy-rss-link-icon\">Read More<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u200b<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Article Originally Published Here A security guard who worked the graveyard shift at Los Angeles City Hall has settled her sexual harassment lawsuit against the company that employed her, in which she alleged that one supervisor asked her if she was on her monthly menstrual cycle. Chandi Davis\u2019 Los Angeles Superior Court lawsuit, filed against Platinum Security Inc., contended that her work environment forced her to resign in 2023. Her suit alleged sexual harassment, gender discrimination, retaliation, failure to prevent [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":1971,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[24],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-52440","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-security-guard"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/test.excelmedias.com\/Security\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52440","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/test.excelmedias.com\/Security\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/test.excelmedias.com\/Security\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/test.excelmedias.com\/Security\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=52440"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/test.excelmedias.com\/Security\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52440\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/test.excelmedias.com\/Security\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1971"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/test.excelmedias.com\/Security\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=52440"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/test.excelmedias.com\/Security\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=52440"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/test.excelmedias.com\/Security\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=52440"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}